Third party dependencies for building design and construction
Not every aspect of a project is within the direct control of the client or their project team. Every project is dependent to some extent on third parties. It is important that these third party dependencies are identified and that their potential impacts are understood, quantified and managed.
Third parties may not be motivated by the same objectives as the client or project team, but nevertheless they can have a serious impact on the programme for a project. It is not safe to assume, just because a time allocation has been made within a programme for a third party dependency, that the third party has any interest in keeping to that programme.
These third parties are often different from stakeholders in that they may have no interest in the project or any ability to affect decisions, and yet they may still be in a position to impact upon success.
Third parties can even be responsible for completely unrelated, circumstantial dependencies, such as the legislative framework. For example, the introduction of changes to the building regulations can have a very significant impact on a project and yet are entirely beyond the control of the project team.
The range of potential third party dependencies is very wide and will vary from project to project, but may include:
- Neighbours (planning matters, party wall matters, access and other permissions, easements, right to light, tree rights and so on).
- Licensing authorities.
- Planning authorities.
- Building control.
- Other statutory authorities and non-statutory authorities (Health and Safety Executive, Environment Agency, Civil Aviation Authority, English Nature, Historic England, CABE, Highways England and so on – see Statutory authorities for more information).
- Utilities companies and other statutory undertakers.
- Purchasers or vendors of land or properties.
- Archaeological or other surveyors (surveys can reveal issues such as; archaeological remains, unexploded bombs, asbestos, contamination, japanese knotweed, roosting bats, great crested newts, tree preservation orders and so on that can cause very significant delays to a project).
- Dependent projects (for example decontamination of the site by a third party prior to sale of land to the client).
- Funding availability.
- Local Chambers of Commerce.
- Politicians.
- Competitors.
- The supply market (goods, labour, plant, equipment and so on).
- Unions.
- The availability of third party services (such as local schools, feeder organisatons, local transport, local infrastructure and so on.)
- The political and legislative framework.
- The wider economic context.
- Customers.
- Emergency services.
- Community groups.
- Special interest groups.
- The press.
Identifying and assessing these third party dependencies should involve the whole project team, and can be best carried out at a project workshop (for example it may form part of a risk workshop – see risk register for more information). Techniques such as PEST analysis (Political, Economic, Social, Technological) can help identify third party dependencies.
It is important that this is not simply a paper exercise. The probability and importance of impacts should be assessed so that resources can be prioritised, responsibilities allocated and strategies put in place to monitor progress (see stakeholder and stakeholder map for more information about how this might be done).
Where risks remain, strategies should be put in place to mitigate, transfer, avoid or accept those risks. See risk register for more information.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- BREEAM independent party.
- Collaborative practices.
- Consultation process.
- Dependency.
- Early BREEAM stakeholder engagement.
- Externalities.
- Independent third party.
- Interested party.
- Receptor.
- Risk management.
- Risk register.
- Stakeholders.
- Stakeholder management: a quality perspective.
- Stakeholder map.
- Statutory authorities.
- Statutory undertakers.
- Technical due diligence.
- Utilities.
Featured articles and news
HBPT and BEAMS Jubilees. Book review.
Does the first Labour budget deliver for the built environment?
What does the UK Budget mean for electrical contractors?
Mixed response as business pays, are there silver linings?
A brownfield housing boost for Liverpool
A 56 million investment from Homes England now approved.
Fostering a future-ready workforce through collaboration
Collaborative Futures: Competence, Capability and Capacity, published and available for download.
Considerate Constructors Scheme acquires Building A Safer Future
Acquisition defines a new era for safety in construction.
AT Awards evening 2024; the winners and finalists
Recognising professionals with outstanding achievements.
Reactions to the Autumn Budget announcement
And key elements of the quoted budget to rebuild Britain.
Chancellor of the Exchequer delivers Budget
Repairing, fixing, rebuilding, protecting and strengthening.
Expectation management in building design
Interest, management, occupant satisfaction and the performance gap.
Connecting conservation research and practice with IHBC
State of the art heritage research & practice and guidance.
Innovative Silica Safety Toolkit
Receives funding boost in memory of construction visionary.
Gentle density and the current context of planning changes
How should designers deliver it now as it appears in NPPF.
Sustainable Futures. Redefining Retrofit for Net Zero Living
More speakers confirmed for BSRIA Briefing 2024.
Making the most of urban land: Brownfield Passports
Policy paper in brief with industry responses welcomed.
The boundaries and networks of the Magonsæte.
Comments
To start a discussion about this article, click 'Add a comment' above and add your thoughts to this discussion page.